Category: ‘ Opinion ’

You are only viewing posts in the ‘Opinion’ category. Click here to see the complete blog.

Traffic Calming Devices

People speed on Scott and Savoline, that’s no news to residents living on these streets. What we, residents, cannot figure out is why traffic calming devices were not built on these roads.  Afterall, if you design a wide road like Scott (or Savoline) then (some) people will drive on them like they’re on Autobahn. 

These ideas are strictly for residential streets (like Scott and Savoline).  I don’t know which ones of these I support, but here are some ideas I have seen in cities I’ve lived in (I lived in 8 different cities in a 7 year period after my wife & I first got married):

  • Bends that are safe at speed limit  (image from Seattle)

  • Median with trees. Southern MD and Washington, DC (affluent areas) does this really well. I lived in a community of small townhomes in Gaithersburg, MD and even there the median had three rows of trees. This also prevents people from passing from beyond the solid yellow line.
    This shot is from Maryland (this was done on an old road, so the trees in the median aren’t grown yet):

  • Create a physical barrier after a few parking spots. For Scott & Savoline that means people won’t be able to pass from the right.  Yet another from MD:
     
  • Traffic circle (again, I am told by people that it works. I hated them in DC and Maryland and VA did not have them. Seattle neighbourhoods do have these though and there they were okay. This picture is from Seattle:
     
  • Lonnnngg speed bumps (not conventional ones). Here’s a picture from Bellevue, WA of a speed bump that does nothing at reasonable speed but does hurt at a higher speed:

  • Raised intersection that work as the bullet above. This is a raised intersection from Gaithersburg, MD. It also works fine at normal speed (costs < $15K to build):

  • Finally, do not create long parallel neighbourhood roads that become bypasses for real streets (eg. people taking Scott Blvd to avoid driving on Bronte / Tremaine and Derry). These streets should be for people living in the community, not for people going from one major street to another.

These are some ideas.  Not all will work here. But they should be considered and implemented so builders like Mattamy or Fieldgate builds them when they first construct residential roads (so the Town doesn’t have to build them later). 


Vibrant Town

I recently watched a documentary on ancient civilizations.  One conclusion I walked away with is this: take a community’s people away, and its buildings and infrastructure will turn into ruins.  Leave its people and they will build another town, often better. 

Municipalities spend a lot of time talking about infrastructure.  But what about its people?  Economic growth (and resulting property values) is directly tied with a community`s ability to retain its residents.

Are people paying a premium to move into your community or are they there because they cannot afford a home anywhere else?

One of my main goal is to make Ward 8 (West Milton) the most desirable part of Milton.  People should not move here for cheap houses, they should be willing to a premium to be here.

What’s with no right turn lanes???

image

Am I the only one who is annoyed at the lack of right-turn-lanes in Milton?

I often have to go south towards Derry.  It doesn’t matter whether I take Thompson or Ontario, neither have a dedicated right-turn lane. 

The image above shows that there is more than enough clearance for a right turn lane.  Why, oh planners, do you insist on not putting them in?  I often find myself stuck on red lights behind just one car waiting to turn right.

Local office, the Highest Office

Annise Parker, the newly elected Mayor of Houston, said the local office was the highest office.  She is right.  The paradox is that people vote in federal and provincial elections but they ignore local offices. But if your shower doesn’t have water in the morning and you are stuck in a traffic jam because the traffic light isn’t working then who the heck cares about anything federal and provincial politicians do. 

Look around, most things you are impacted by is decided by your municipality (from the transit service to the roads you drive on to local of sidewalks, traffic lights and stop signs to police & fire service to … well, you got the idea). 

Vision…

Plastic_Binocular[1] Organizations without vision lose focus and fail.  Vision is more important than strategy.  If you have a clear vision then you will eventually attract the right strategy.

Milton’s vision is “Engaging, Balance, Connected”.  What does that mean?  What does ‘connected’ mean?  Connected via roads?  Trails? Broadband?  Connected as a community?

It has five goals.  Lets analyze some of them:

  • A responsible, cost-effective and accountable local government. The explanation adds a direction: “Demonstrate leadership in matters that affect Milton“.
    • Has Milton demonstrated leadership?
    • In sustainability Milton is certainly not a leader (arguably Halton and Oakville are).
    • I can go to the City of Mississauga website and see their entire budget, financial statements from previous candidates and a lot of other data that the Town of Milton doesn’t publish online. That’s not leadership.
    • Halton streams all council meetings online, Milton has no such accountability.
  • A safe, liveable and healthy community. The direction adds: “Protect and enhance our heritage, identity and character“.
    • What is Milton’s “character”? What does it mean to be “Milton”?
    • Is there a lens we can look through to make sure new land-use and development applications fit the character?
    • Are developers looking at enhancing it? Is Milton holding developers accountable?
    • The residents on Duncan Lane living next to the rail track do not even have the most basic sound barrier (they just have a small metal fence). Not safe, not livable and certainly not healthy.
    • Residents do not get biking / walking trails and neighbourhood parks until years after moving in to the community.
    • Heck even basic things like coordinating street lights is not done for years.
  • A diverse and sustainable economy – Direction adds: “Attract and retain employers that provide a range of employment opportunities and assessment growth“.
    • The Town may disagree with me but Milton isn’t doing enough to attract high-quality employers. The assumption is, ‘if you build them, they’ll come’.
    • Check out mississauga’s online business section. There’s a ton of information there.  Milton has http://www.miltonthiswayup.ca/ (did you even know about it)?
  • A thriving natural environment that is a valued community asset to be protected, maintained and enjoyed
    • Again, Halton has taken the leadership with Sustainable Halton and Oakville has initiatives, but there’s no “Sustainable Milton” plan.
    • Scott Blvd is getting a bus service only because the transit plan passed by just one vote (and that’s with two missing councillors).
    • Milton has no problem with excessive street lights in some areas but it does complain about having to maintain trees.
    • The long-term priorities are backward IMO. Development keeps moving further and further west, practically touching the escarpment.
    • Many parts of Milton (parts of Main Street, pretty much all of Steeles) are an eye sore.

On the day-to-day basis Milton is actually run fairly well.  In execution of its vision it isn’t.  I think part of the problem is how its vision is highly ambiguous.

Does your municipality have a clear vision? Is it concise and easy to understand?

More importantly, what is your vision (for your municipality)?

Click here to expand the rest of this article

Sanford, Florida & Streetlights

Cats4[1]

Sanford Florida was about the size of Milton in 2000 and then again in 2006.  I visited my cousin there.  One thing struck me: residential streets had half as many street lights as newer ones in Milton do.  More interestingly, major ones (similar to Derry Road) had almost no street lights other than on major intersections.  It did not make driving unsafe.  When there were no cars, you were okay with just your headlights. When there were a lot of cars, a lot of headlights lit up the road anyway. Instead they spent money on “cat’s eyes” that reflected beautifully in headlights and made lane markers more visible than they are in Milton. 

The Town of Milton spends 1% of property taxes on street lights.  It helps to think of ways to reduce that cost.  As an amateur astronomer, here’s what I have to say: “if a street light can be reduced without impacting safety then that streetlight should not be put up”.  Repeat that exercise until we are at the minimum number of street lights required.  And make sure new lights are solar powered LED lights so we have an even lower operating cost.

Ironically, the Town doesn’t want more trees planted because it is worried about maintaining them, but it has no issues bombarding roads with more street lights than are absolutely necessary.  I don’t need major roads that do not have homes fronting on them to light up like Christmas trees. 

Click here to expand the rest of this article

My opinion is my opinion

When you ask for my opinion, you are asking for my opinion.  You are not asking for right answers.  I may not have them.  I do have views on things.  I am wrong from time to time.  Some of my blog posts state facts (Category:Information) while others are my opinions (Category:Opinion). 

There would be fewer disagreements in this world if people could differentiate between facts and opinions.  A person can be wrong about a fact, but not about his or her opinion. You can disagree with opinions, but not with facts. 

Turbine street lights

You already saw my post about the Big Belly, here’s another innovative concept: turbine powered street lights. And dang, they look good too!

Municipalities need to figure out how to reduce the operating cost of street lights.  1% of Milton’s property taxes go towards it.

image

Milton Intensification

imageHow is it that a town that created the beautiful downtown Main Street let other parts of Main Street (and all of Steeles Ave) turn into such an eyesore?

Milton just went through an intensification study.  The final report will be available online here.  If executed well, this can do wonders for Milton.  But Milton has gone through other ambitious exercises (Eco Village) with no results.  The key is to make sure that this does not turn into one of those exercises.

My view is that turning Main Street from Bronte to James Snow into the following is potentially a good thing :-

image image

However, I don’t want to see any more of these in Milton:

image image

The study proposes respecting surrounding low-density neighbourhoods by staging heights :-

image

Another trick is to make sure that zoning is handled well and respected.  Only then can we create walk-able neighbourhoods:

image

image

You can see the core urban area map here:

image

I would personally continue intensification all the way to James Snow, if not further East.  There is a second GO station planned at Trafalgar.  Maintaining a higher population density along Main Street between these stations will help greatly with transit. 

The Thompson / Main GO station is one reason why I don’t think the central library should have gone at the Thompson / Derry intersection. That was an ideal spot for a residential area from where residents could walk to the GO station. 

Now that you have my thoughts on this, what do you think?

Web-stream these meetings already!

I got ready to go to the 7:30pm Council meeting today. At 7:10pm the babysitting deal fell through.  It’s the third Council meeting I had to miss because I could not find babysitters (my wife has classes on Monday nights this semester). 

How hard can it be to stream these meetings online?  Put a $500 camera connected to a computer and stream the video.  Heck I will go set it up for the town. 

It’s 2010!  I was video chatting with family ten years ago.  Talk about being antiquated!

Accountability

Two pillars of accountability are answerability and enforcement

Answerability requires public officials to provide information about their actions and justify them to the public.  This requires both accessibility and transparency.  Some public officials tend to be inaccessible.  Very few ever state their values in writing.  If they are not both accessible and transparent, then they do not wish to be answerable. 

Enforcement implies that an institution responsible for accountability can sanction the offending party or individual.  Often this is absent as well. Except in extreme cases, voters have to wait until the next election.

Democracy cannot function without true accountability.  Even if there is a democratic process, without accountability it’s not a real democracy.  

I am committed to completely accountability.

Milton.ca and web feeds

128px-Feed-icon.svg[1] A web feed (news feed, RSS feed, syndicated feed) allows users to subscribe to frequently updated content. All blogs, all news sites and most personal websites have feeds readers can subscribe to.  It takes the need to frequently check the site away.  You get notified when there’s new content.

Why does milton.ca not have feeds for every subsection (it does for the main page.  Even if you are in a sub-section, you only get RSS for the main page)?  I want to see the list of all registered candidates for the 2010 municipal election. I do not want to have to check the document every day. Instead, I want to be able to subscribe to the feed, so I get notified in my RSS reader (I use Internet Explorer for it) whenever they change that page. 

[Shameless plug: you can subscribe to my RSS feeds by either clicking the feed icon in your browser or by clicking this link, if you use an external application.]

What to do when your principles are challenged

A comment was posted in response to my post: What makes a good councillor.  The main question was:

…what do you think a councillor should do when a group of his/her constituents asks for support for something that is in opposition to his/her principles?

You can read the comment and my response here.

What makes a good councillor

1210-12409560184r2o[1] It’s not their views on policies as much as their principles (see here for the difference).  More importantly, a councillor needs to listen to his or her constituents and represent their interests in the Council.  An inaccessible councillor cannot possibly be a good representative. Unfortunately, we have a couple of these in Milton. 

Depressing data on retirement saving

coins_money1-800x600[1] Here is a depressing news related to my previous post on retirement saving.  An RBC survey found that only 35% of Canadians will contribute to RRSP in 2009.  Worse, 45% of those above 55 are not doing any retirement planning whatsoever.  Worse yet, 32% of Canadians have not even started saving for retirement yet.

It’s the realm of Federal (or at least Provincial) government but I am a big fan of some forced savings in this case (CPP and Old Age won’t cut it). 

Top Canadian Blogs - Top Blogs