<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aesthetics, urban design &amp; milton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zhamid.ca/info/aesthetics-urban-design-milton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zhamid.ca/info/aesthetics-urban-design-milton/</link>
	<description>Milton Council Candidate from Ward 8 (Hawthorne Village at Escarpment &#38; Milton Trails Communities)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: iPhone Was No Fluke &#124; Zeeshan Hamid</title>
		<link>http://www.zhamid.ca/info/aesthetics-urban-design-milton/comment-page-1/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone Was No Fluke &#124; Zeeshan Hamid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 02:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zhamid.ca/info/aesthetics-urban-design-milton/#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>[...] 18th century development in Europe was specifically designed to appear attractive with aesthetics in mind. Just look at Beth, England. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 18th century development in Europe was specifically designed to appear attractive with aesthetics in mind. Just look at Beth, England. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeeshan Hamid</title>
		<link>http://www.zhamid.ca/info/aesthetics-urban-design-milton/comment-page-1/#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeeshan Hamid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zhamid.ca/info/aesthetics-urban-design-milton/#comment-654</guid>
		<description>Great comment. I&#039;ll repost your comment in a blog post to give it more visibility :).  I&#039;ll respond to it there as well. Thanks :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comment. I&#8217;ll repost your comment in a blog post to give it more visibility :).  I&#8217;ll respond to it there as well. Thanks :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiltonSearch.com</title>
		<link>http://www.zhamid.ca/info/aesthetics-urban-design-milton/comment-page-1/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>MiltonSearch.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zhamid.ca/info/aesthetics-urban-design-milton/#comment-653</guid>
		<description>I have actually walked around that exact area and building before whilst backpacking in the UK in 1998. Bath is a beautiful city but unfortunately I would say that Milton, generally, is not.

The downtown core is nice actually -- it&#039;s not quite Lakeshore Rd. through Oakville, but it is a nice, quaint (albeit small) downtown area. Unfortunately once you get to Ontario St. to the east and Bronte to the west, everything is an eyesore with no character.

One of the biggest disappointments were the renovations to Milton Mall -- that corner was screaming out for some kind of retail frontage onto Main/Ontario with some character that you could walk around/to etc.

Let&#039;s hope the infill development in the coming years really takes aesthetics into consideration, including also many of the ideas you have proposed over the past few months here, Zeeshan.

Let&#039;s spend a little more to give some of the buildings some character, and when in doubt, add trees, trees, trees.

The residential areas of Milton are ok -- they are a little Mississauga-ey (is that a word?), but I do believe that HV and HVE, although very &quot;cookie-cutter&quot; (or the &#039;urban filing cabinet&#039; as my Uncle would say) are nice-looking residential areas. The Mattamy Homes especially have a nice look to them for the most part and as the trees grow, the area will take on a nice character -- you are already seeing this in the Derry/Trudeau area where some of the trees are 8+ years old now -- there are some very nice streets. Yes, the houses are crammed in and close to the roads, but I&#039;m not bothered by that as long as there are many parks nearby for everyone.

As you&#039;ve pointed out, what needs to be done is high density housing along the major routes as opposed to McMansions to make our transit system more effective -- that is a huge challenge for this town.

Again, what hurts Milton is that most people&#039;s impression of the town (it was mine before I moved here) is the stretch of Hwy 25 to the 401 - Ontario St. past EC Drury, the Mall, low-income housing near Steeles, strip plazas along Steeles, restaurants/gas stations at the 401. I remember being so pleasantly surprised when I first drove into downtown Milton by accident....

Zeeshan is right -- Milton needs to start aesthetically becoming an &#039;Escarpment Community&#039; as we move foward -- let&#039;s start &#039;looking&#039; like a desirable town nestled at the base of Ontario&#039;s best (and possibly only) geographic feature!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have actually walked around that exact area and building before whilst backpacking in the UK in 1998. Bath is a beautiful city but unfortunately I would say that Milton, generally, is not.</p>
<p>The downtown core is nice actually &#8212; it&#8217;s not quite Lakeshore Rd. through Oakville, but it is a nice, quaint (albeit small) downtown area. Unfortunately once you get to Ontario St. to the east and Bronte to the west, everything is an eyesore with no character.</p>
<p>One of the biggest disappointments were the renovations to Milton Mall &#8212; that corner was screaming out for some kind of retail frontage onto Main/Ontario with some character that you could walk around/to etc.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope the infill development in the coming years really takes aesthetics into consideration, including also many of the ideas you have proposed over the past few months here, Zeeshan.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s spend a little more to give some of the buildings some character, and when in doubt, add trees, trees, trees.</p>
<p>The residential areas of Milton are ok &#8212; they are a little Mississauga-ey (is that a word?), but I do believe that HV and HVE, although very &#8220;cookie-cutter&#8221; (or the &#8216;urban filing cabinet&#8217; as my Uncle would say) are nice-looking residential areas. The Mattamy Homes especially have a nice look to them for the most part and as the trees grow, the area will take on a nice character &#8212; you are already seeing this in the Derry/Trudeau area where some of the trees are 8+ years old now &#8212; there are some very nice streets. Yes, the houses are crammed in and close to the roads, but I&#8217;m not bothered by that as long as there are many parks nearby for everyone.</p>
<p>As you&#8217;ve pointed out, what needs to be done is high density housing along the major routes as opposed to McMansions to make our transit system more effective &#8212; that is a huge challenge for this town.</p>
<p>Again, what hurts Milton is that most people&#8217;s impression of the town (it was mine before I moved here) is the stretch of Hwy 25 to the 401 &#8211; Ontario St. past EC Drury, the Mall, low-income housing near Steeles, strip plazas along Steeles, restaurants/gas stations at the 401. I remember being so pleasantly surprised when I first drove into downtown Milton by accident&#8230;.</p>
<p>Zeeshan is right &#8212; Milton needs to start aesthetically becoming an &#8216;Escarpment Community&#8217; as we move foward &#8212; let&#8217;s start &#8216;looking&#8217; like a desirable town nestled at the base of Ontario&#8217;s best (and possibly only) geographic feature!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
